diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'core/src/test/scala/spark/scheduler/LocalSchedulerSuite.scala')
| -rw-r--r-- | core/src/test/scala/spark/scheduler/LocalSchedulerSuite.scala | 206 |
1 files changed, 206 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/core/src/test/scala/spark/scheduler/LocalSchedulerSuite.scala b/core/src/test/scala/spark/scheduler/LocalSchedulerSuite.scala new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..8bd813fd14 --- /dev/null +++ b/core/src/test/scala/spark/scheduler/LocalSchedulerSuite.scala @@ -0,0 +1,206 @@ +package spark.scheduler + +import org.scalatest.FunSuite +import org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfter + +import spark._ +import spark.scheduler._ +import spark.scheduler.cluster._ +import scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer +import scala.collection.mutable.{ConcurrentMap, HashMap} +import java.util.concurrent.Semaphore +import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch +import java.util.Properties + +class Lock() { + var finished = false + def jobWait() = { + synchronized { + while(!finished) { + this.wait() + } + } + } + + def jobFinished() = { + synchronized { + finished = true + this.notifyAll() + } + } +} + +object TaskThreadInfo { + val threadToLock = HashMap[Int, Lock]() + val threadToRunning = HashMap[Int, Boolean]() + val threadToStarted = HashMap[Int, CountDownLatch]() +} + +/* + * 1. each thread contains one job. + * 2. each job contains one stage. + * 3. each stage only contains one task. + * 4. each task(launched) must be lanched orderly(using threadToStarted) to make sure + * it will get cpu core resource, and will wait to finished after user manually + * release "Lock" and then cluster will contain another free cpu cores. + * 5. each task(pending) must use "sleep" to make sure it has been added to taskSetManager queue, + * thus it will be scheduled later when cluster has free cpu cores. + */ +class LocalSchedulerSuite extends FunSuite with LocalSparkContext { + + def createThread(threadIndex: Int, poolName: String, sc: SparkContext, sem: Semaphore) { + + TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(threadIndex) = false + val nums = sc.parallelize(threadIndex to threadIndex, 1) + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(threadIndex) = new Lock() + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(threadIndex) = new CountDownLatch(1) + new Thread { + if (poolName != null) { + sc.addLocalProperties("spark.scheduler.cluster.fair.pool",poolName) + } + override def run() { + val ans = nums.map(number => { + TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(number) = true + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(number).countDown() + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(number).jobWait() + TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(number) = false + number + }).collect() + assert(ans.toList === List(threadIndex)) + sem.release() + } + }.start() + } + + test("Local FIFO scheduler end-to-end test") { + System.setProperty("spark.cluster.schedulingmode", "FIFO") + sc = new SparkContext("local[4]", "test") + val sem = new Semaphore(0) + + createThread(1,null,sc,sem) + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(1).await() + createThread(2,null,sc,sem) + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(2).await() + createThread(3,null,sc,sem) + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(3).await() + createThread(4,null,sc,sem) + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(4).await() + // thread 5 and 6 (stage pending)must meet following two points + // 1. stages (taskSetManager) of jobs in thread 5 and 6 should be add to taskSetManager + // queue before executing TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(1).jobFinished() + // 2. priority of stage in thread 5 should be prior to priority of stage in thread 6 + // So I just use "sleep" 1s here for each thread. + // TODO: any better solution? + createThread(5,null,sc,sem) + Thread.sleep(1000) + createThread(6,null,sc,sem) + Thread.sleep(1000) + + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(1) === true) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(2) === true) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(3) === true) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(4) === true) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(5) === false) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(6) === false) + + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(1).jobFinished() + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(5).await() + + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(1) === false) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(2) === true) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(3) === true) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(4) === true) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(5) === true) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(6) === false) + + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(3).jobFinished() + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(6).await() + + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(1) === false) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(2) === true) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(3) === false) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(4) === true) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(5) === true) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(6) === true) + + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(2).jobFinished() + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(4).jobFinished() + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(5).jobFinished() + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(6).jobFinished() + sem.acquire(6) + } + + test("Local fair scheduler end-to-end test") { + sc = new SparkContext("local[8]", "LocalSchedulerSuite") + val sem = new Semaphore(0) + System.setProperty("spark.cluster.schedulingmode", "FAIR") + val xmlPath = getClass.getClassLoader.getResource("fairscheduler.xml").getFile() + System.setProperty("spark.fairscheduler.allocation.file", xmlPath) + + createThread(10,"1",sc,sem) + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(10).await() + createThread(20,"2",sc,sem) + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(20).await() + createThread(30,"3",sc,sem) + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(30).await() + + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(10) === true) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(20) === true) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(30) === true) + + createThread(11,"1",sc,sem) + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(11).await() + createThread(21,"2",sc,sem) + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(21).await() + createThread(31,"3",sc,sem) + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(31).await() + + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(11) === true) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(21) === true) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(31) === true) + + createThread(12,"1",sc,sem) + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(12).await() + createThread(22,"2",sc,sem) + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(22).await() + createThread(32,"3",sc,sem) + + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(12) === true) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(22) === true) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(32) === false) + + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(10).jobFinished() + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(32).await() + + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(32) === true) + + //1. Similar with above scenario, sleep 1s for stage of 23 and 33 to be added to taskSetManager + // queue so that cluster will assign free cpu core to stage 23 after stage 11 finished. + //2. priority of 23 and 33 will be meaningless as using fair scheduler here. + createThread(23,"2",sc,sem) + createThread(33,"3",sc,sem) + Thread.sleep(1000) + + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(11).jobFinished() + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(23).await() + + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(23) === true) + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(33) === false) + + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(12).jobFinished() + TaskThreadInfo.threadToStarted(33).await() + + assert(TaskThreadInfo.threadToRunning(33) === true) + + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(20).jobFinished() + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(21).jobFinished() + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(22).jobFinished() + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(23).jobFinished() + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(30).jobFinished() + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(31).jobFinished() + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(32).jobFinished() + TaskThreadInfo.threadToLock(33).jobFinished() + + sem.acquire(11) + } +} |