summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/nuttx/arch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorpatacongo <patacongo@42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3>2007-11-23 22:32:52 +0000
committerpatacongo <patacongo@42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3>2007-11-23 22:32:52 +0000
commit2937aaaaf09c2f0d5b46b1a2a30eac962d8455d3 (patch)
tree4c931c8603e4c674f6eec802044b430a953536db /nuttx/arch
parentfa64306fac12fed8522ab0facdb2cd7f211b2d30 (diff)
downloadpx4-nuttx-2937aaaaf09c2f0d5b46b1a2a30eac962d8455d3.tar.gz
px4-nuttx-2937aaaaf09c2f0d5b46b1a2a30eac962d8455d3.tar.bz2
px4-nuttx-2937aaaaf09c2f0d5b46b1a2a30eac962d8455d3.zip
Debug can now be selectively enabled by subystem
git-svn-id: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/nuttx/code/trunk@404 42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3
Diffstat (limited to 'nuttx/arch')
-rw-r--r--nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_blocktask.c6
-rw-r--r--nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_deviceimage.c6
-rw-r--r--nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_exit.c6
-rw-r--r--nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_releasepending.c6
-rw-r--r--nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_reprioritizertr.c6
-rw-r--r--nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_unblocktask.c6
6 files changed, 18 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_blocktask.c b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_blocktask.c
index 66cd89372..ad432fa02 100644
--- a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_blocktask.c
+++ b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_blocktask.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ void up_block_task(_TCB *tcb, tstate_t task_state)
_TCB *rtcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head;
boolean switch_needed;
- dbg("Blocking TCB=%p\n", tcb);
+ sdbg("Blocking TCB=%p\n", tcb);
/* Remove the tcb task from the ready-to-run list. If we
* are blocking the task at the head of the task list (the
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ void up_block_task(_TCB *tcb, tstate_t task_state)
*/
rtcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head;
- dbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", rtcb);
+ sdbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", rtcb);
/* The way that we handle signals in the simulation is kind of
* a kludge. This would be unsafe in a truly multi-threaded, interrupt
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ void up_block_task(_TCB *tcb, tstate_t task_state)
if (rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver)
{
- dbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", rtcb);
+ sdbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", rtcb);
((sig_deliver_t)rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver)(rtcb);
rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver = NULL;
}
diff --git a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_deviceimage.c b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_deviceimage.c
index 70dfc9cab..ac728c7f5 100644
--- a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_deviceimage.c
+++ b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_deviceimage.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
****************************************************************************/
#ifdef VFAT_STANDALONE
-# define dbg(format, arg...) printf(format, ##arg)
+# define sdbg(format, arg...) printf(format, ##arg)
#endif
/****************************************************************************
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ char *up_deviceimage(void)
ret = inflateInit(&strm);
if (ret != Z_OK)
{
- dbg("inflateInit FAILED: ret=%d msg=\"%s\"\n", ret, strm.msg ? strm.msg : "No message" );
+ sdbg("inflateInit FAILED: ret=%d msg=\"%s\"\n", ret, strm.msg ? strm.msg : "No message" );
return NULL;
}
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ char *up_deviceimage(void)
case Z_DATA_ERROR:
case Z_MEM_ERROR:
case Z_STREAM_ERROR:
- dbg("inflate FAILED: ret=%d msg=\"%s\"\n", ret, strm.msg ? strm.msg : "No message" );
+ sdbg("inflate FAILED: ret=%d msg=\"%s\"\n", ret, strm.msg ? strm.msg : "No message" );
(void)inflateEnd(&strm);
free(pbuffer);
return NULL;
diff --git a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_exit.c b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_exit.c
index 650403b7e..8ab8f92cf 100644
--- a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_exit.c
+++ b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_exit.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ void _exit(int status)
{
_TCB* tcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head;
- dbg("TCB=%p exitting\n", tcb);
+ sdbg("TCB=%p exitting\n", tcb);
/* Remove the tcb task from the ready-to-run list. We can
* ignore the return value because we know that a context
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ void _exit(int status)
*/
tcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head;
- dbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", tcb);
+ sdbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", tcb);
/* The way that we handle signals in the simulation is kind of
* a kludge. This would be unsafe in a truly multi-threaded, interrupt
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ void _exit(int status)
if (tcb->xcp.sigdeliver)
{
- dbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", tcb);
+ sdbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", tcb);
((sig_deliver_t)tcb->xcp.sigdeliver)(tcb);
tcb->xcp.sigdeliver = NULL;
}
diff --git a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_releasepending.c b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_releasepending.c
index 8a494a354..5f25a0db6 100644
--- a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_releasepending.c
+++ b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_releasepending.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ void up_release_pending(void)
{
_TCB *rtcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head;
- dbg("From TCB=%p\n", rtcb);
+ sdbg("From TCB=%p\n", rtcb);
/* Merge the g_pendingtasks list into the g_readytorun task list */
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ void up_release_pending(void)
*/
rtcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head;
- dbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", rtcb);
+ sdbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", rtcb);
/* The way that we handle signals in the simulation is kind of
* a kludge. This would be unsafe in a truly multi-threaded, interrupt
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ void up_release_pending(void)
if (rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver)
{
- dbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", rtcb);
+ sdbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", rtcb);
((sig_deliver_t)rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver)(rtcb);
rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver = NULL;
}
diff --git a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_reprioritizertr.c b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_reprioritizertr.c
index d4d91a88e..f2a2b2828 100644
--- a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_reprioritizertr.c
+++ b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_reprioritizertr.c
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ void up_reprioritize_rtr(_TCB *tcb, ubyte priority)
_TCB *rtcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head;
boolean switch_needed;
- dbg("TCB=%p PRI=%d\n", tcb, priority);
+ sdbg("TCB=%p PRI=%d\n", tcb, priority);
/* Remove the tcb task from the ready-to-run list.
* sched_removereadytorun will return TRUE if we just
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ void up_reprioritize_rtr(_TCB *tcb, ubyte priority)
*/
rtcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head;
- dbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", rtcb);
+ sdbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", rtcb);
/* The way that we handle signals in the simulation is kind of
* a kludge. This would be unsafe in a truly multi-threaded, interrupt
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ void up_reprioritize_rtr(_TCB *tcb, ubyte priority)
if (rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver)
{
- dbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", rtcb);
+ sdbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", rtcb);
((sig_deliver_t)rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver)(rtcb);
rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver = NULL;
}
diff --git a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_unblocktask.c b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_unblocktask.c
index bf25a14a5..ba5f5987d 100644
--- a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_unblocktask.c
+++ b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_unblocktask.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ void up_unblock_task(_TCB *tcb)
{
_TCB *rtcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head;
- dbg("Unblocking TCB=%p\n", tcb);
+ sdbg("Unblocking TCB=%p\n", tcb);
/* Remove the task from the blocked task list */
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ void up_unblock_task(_TCB *tcb)
*/
rtcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head;
- dbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", rtcb);
+ sdbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", rtcb);
/* The way that we handle signals in the simulation is kind of
* a kludge. This would be unsafe in a truly multi-threaded, interrupt
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ void up_unblock_task(_TCB *tcb)
if (rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver)
{
- dbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", rtcb);
+ sdbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", rtcb);
((sig_deliver_t)rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver)(rtcb);
rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver = NULL;
}